by: John Clore | 3/22/2025 at 7:22 AM
In a move that has reignited debates over federal involvement in education, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing Education Secretary Linda McMahon to take steps toward dismantling the U.S. Department of Education. While the complete dissolution of the department requires congressional approval, this action has sparked a divided response among Michigan officials and educators.
Federal Overreach and Mandates
Critics of the Department of Education argue that federal mandates, particularly those related to COVID-19 protocols and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, have imposed undue burdens on local school districts. The department’s previous directives tied federal funding to the implementation of specific COVID-19 measures and DEI training programs, leading some to view these requirements as overreach into state and local education systems.
-
DOGE Travel mug with a handle
$25.00 Add to cart -
Skilled Labor Isn’t Cheap (Support The Trades)
$22.00 – $30.00 Select options This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
Brotherhood (Support The Trades)
$15.50 – $24.00 Select options This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page -
Unique D.O.G.E. Ceramic Mug – 11oz & 15oz
$7.68 Select options This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page
Michigan’s Stance on Federal Involvement
The Michigan Department of Education expressed disapproval of the executive order, emphasizing the potential negative impact on students due to cuts in staff and funding. Dr. Pamela Pugh, president of the State Board of Education, stated, “The federal government needs to do more—not less—to help all children learn and be physically and mentally healthy so they can achieve their dreams.”
Conversely, Michigan’s State Superintendent, Dr. Michael F. Rice, downplayed the likelihood of the department’s closure, asserting that “Congress and the American people will not allow it.”
Michigan’s Stance on Federal Involvement
The Michigan Department of Education expressed disapproval of the executive order, emphasizing the potential negative impact on students due to cuts in staff and funding. Dr. Pamela Pugh, president of the State Board of Education, stated, “The federal government needs to do more—not less—to help all children learn and be physically and mentally healthy so they can achieve their dreams.”
Conversely, Michigan’s State Superintendent, Dr. Michael F. Rice, downplayed the likelihood of the department’s closure, asserting that “Congress and the American people will not allow it.”
Concerns Over Funding and Support
Opponents of the executive order, including Democratic legislators, warn that dismantling the department could result in the loss of over $2 billion in federal funding for Michigan. State Representative Matt Koleszar (D-Plymouth) cautioned that eliminating the department would strip away educational opportunities for vulnerable students, affecting services such as teacher retention, textbook updates, and after-school programs.
Federal Funding Tied to COVID-19 and DEI Initiatives
The Department of Education has historically provided financial incentives for schools to adopt certain policies. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund (ESSER) allocated significant resources to assist schools in managing pandemic-related challenges. However, the allocation and utilization of these funds have been subjects of scrutiny and debate. Wikipedia
Additionally, the department has funded DEI training programs aimed at promoting inclusive educational environments. These initiatives have been contentious, with some viewing them as essential for addressing systemic inequalities, while others perceive them as ideological impositions. Notably, the Department of Education recently terminated over $600 million in grants to institutions and nonprofits that were using taxpayer funds to train teachers on what it described as “divisive ideologies,” including DEI and Critical Race Theory. The White House
The Path Forward: State Control Over Education
The current discourse underscores a broader debate about the appropriate role of the federal government in education. Advocates for abolishing the Department of Education argue that education should be a state and local responsibility, free from federal mandates that may not align with local values or needs. They contend that such a shift would empower states to tailor educational policies to their unique populations without the constraints of federal oversight.
As discussions continue, the future of federal involvement in education remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the debate has prompted a reexamination of how best to serve students while respecting the balance of power between federal and state authorities.
DOGE on Michigan Wasteful Spending: LGBTQ, DEI, and Transgender Study Funds Could Fix the Roads Instead!
by: John Clore | 3/20/2025 at 9:11 AM LANSING, MI – After writing Shocking Waste: Federal Audit Uncovers Billions Wasted on Foreign Social Programs And seeing countless people on social media say, “We need DOGE in Michigan,” I decided to DOGE Michigan’s wasteful spending—here’s what I uncovered. Michigan’s state government
Advertisement
Advertisement Company Turns Away Business From Moms For Liberty of Livingston
LIVINGSTON COUNTY- Moms for Liberty of Livingston County has officially been canceled by a billboard company. Jennifer Smith, chapter chair of Moms for LIberty of Livingston had arranged, paid for, and was approved to have three digital billboards put up within the local area by a company called Blip. This
Advertisement
