by: John Clore | 2/26/2025 at 8:54 AM
Republican lawmakers in Michigan are taking decisive action to uphold the principles upon which the nation was founded, introducing a resolution urging the Supreme Court to revisit its 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. This ruling, which mandated the nationwide legalization of same-sex marriage, has long been a point of contention for conservatives who argue it oversteps states’ rights and contradicts the foundational values of marriage.
A Bold Move for Conservative Leadership
Michigan State Representative Josh Schriver, a staunch advocate for conservative principles, introduced the resolution with the support of 12 Republican co-sponsors. Schriver’s office emphasized that Obergefell v. Hodges is at odds with Michigan’s Constitution and the moral framework that has defined marriage for centuries.
“This resolution isn’t about discrimination—it’s about restoring states’ rights and returning this issue to the people rather than leaving it in the hands of unelected justices,” said Schriver.
Whitmer’s Outrage and Political Grandstanding
Predictably, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer wasted no time in launching a divisive attack on the resolution, resorting to inflammatory rhetoric rather than engaging in constructive debate. In a video on the social platform X, Whitmer dismissed the resolution as “hateful” and arrogantly declared, “Hell no.”
Whitmer’s reaction underscores her unwillingness to acknowledge differing viewpoints, as she prioritizes progressive activism over the concerns of millions of Michiganders who believe in traditional marriage. Instead of respecting democratic debate, she continues to push her radical agenda, ignoring the voices of those who support the resolution.
Attorney General Dana Nessel’s Defiance of Federal Authority
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel has taken her opposition a step further, openly defying federal authority by declaring she will ignore executive orders issued by the President of the United States. Furthermore, she is actively suing to block President Trump’s federal funding pause, demonstrating her determination to obstruct conservative policies at every turn.
Nessel, who has a history of using her position to advance her personal beliefs, flaunted her defiance with a social media post featuring her wedding ring. Her actions raise serious concerns about an attorney general who refuses to enforce federal law, choosing instead to act as an activist rather than uphold her constitutional duties.
Democrats Firm Against Conservative Values
State Representative Jason Morgan, a Democrat, predictably labeled the resolution as “homophobic,” using divisive language to vilify those who believe in traditional marriage. However, Republican lawmakers are standing firm, emphasizing that their stance is about upholding constitutional principles, not targeting individuals.
The battle over this resolution highlights a broader conflict between progressive overreach and conservative values. While Whitmer and Nessel push their radical agendas and attack those who disagree, Republican leaders are taking a stand to ensure that states retain their rights and that moral traditions are not erased in favor of political expediency.
As this debate unfolds, it is clear that Michigan’s Republican lawmakers are fighting for the voices of their constituents, while Whitmer and Nessel continue to prioritize their own activist-driven narratives over the rule of law and the will of the people.