by: John Clore | 3/19/2025 at 11:29AM

Coordinated Attacks on Tesla Dealerships Raise Questions About Funding

In recent months, Tesla dealerships across the United States have faced an unprecedented wave of vandalism and violence, coinciding with CEO Elon Musk’s increasing role in President Trump’s administration. What initially started as isolated protests has escalated into coordinated attacks involving arson, gunfire, and property destruction. As authorities dig deeper into these incidents, evidence is emerging that many of the protesters are not acting independently but are instead being financially incentivized by well-funded organizations with political motives. 

Protesters Paid to Disrupt: Following the Money Trail

Recent investigations suggest that many individuals participating in the Tesla protests are being paid up to $200 per day for their involvement. While direct advertisements recruiting protesters remain elusive, multiple sources point to grassroots activist organizations with deep pockets funneling money to disrupt Tesla operations. These groups, often tied to broader progressive movements, are suspected of using non-profit entities and political action committees (PACs) as intermediaries to distribute funds. (businessinsider.com)

  • Political Nonprofits and PACs: Progressive activist networks reportedly channel funds through advocacy groups that specialize in organizing street demonstrations and protests.

  • Crowdfunding Campaigns: Online platforms have seen a rise in anonymous donations supporting “climate action” and “anti-corporate” movements, which align with the narrative against Musk and Tesla.

  • Union-Backed Protests: Some reports suggest that labor unions opposed to Tesla’s non-union workforce are quietly supporting demonstrations, leveraging their networks to recruit participants.

  • USAID’s Role in Funneling Money to Activist Groups: Investigative reports have long suggested that the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been used as a vehicle for funding global activist organizations, including those linked to George Soros-backed NGOs. USAID, under the guise of humanitarian aid and democracy promotion, has funneled millions of taxpayer dollars into various non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that align with leftist causes. Some of these same NGOs are tied to domestic protest movements, raising concerns about whether federal funds are indirectly supporting disruptive activities against private businesses like Tesla.

  • Direct Connections to George Soros and the Deep State Web: A detailed investigative report I wrote titled “The Deep State Web: Media, Politics, and the Globalist Influence of George Soros” outlines how Soros-linked individuals, Democratic operatives, and media networks coordinate efforts to push political activism that aligns with their globalist agenda. The report names key figures and organizations that have benefited from Soros’ vast funding network, which has been linked to activist movements and civil unrest, raising concerns that these well-funded networks are actively involved in supporting and organizing the Tesla dealership protests.

​My investigation into the recent vandalism of Tesla dealerships across the United States has uncovered a rabbit hole containing a complex network of organizations and individuals potentially orchestrating and funding these disruptive activities. Notably, connections have been identified between certain activist groups, political operatives, and media entities linked to billionaire financier George Soros and Democratic Party affiliates.

Crowds on Demand: A Publicity Firm’s Role

One organization at the center of this controversy is Crowds on Demand, a Los Angeles-based publicity firm founded by Adam Swart in 2012. The company specializes in providing actors for various events, including protests, rallies, and advocacy campaigns. Their services encompass organizing demonstrations and supplying crowds for hire, effectively allowing clients to simulate public support or opposition. This practice has raised ethical concerns about the authenticity of such events and their influence on public opinion.Wikipedia

Federal Investigation into Organized Funding

The Department of Justice has classified these attacks as acts of domestic terrorism, intensifying efforts to trace financial transactions linked to organizers. Officials are examining whether payments made to demonstrators violate federal laws concerning unlawful assembly and property destruction. Law enforcement agencies are also reviewing connections between advocacy groups and high-profile political donors who may be indirectly financing the unrest. (thetimes.co.uk)

Elon Musk’s Response: Political Targeting?

Elon Musk has strongly condemned the vandalism, arguing that these attacks stem from deep-seated opposition to his role in exposing government inefficiencies and corporate fraud. Musk has hinted at political motivations behind the unrest, suggesting that elements within the progressive movement are working to undermine him for his economic and political influence. (nypost.com)

Tesla Owners Take Precautions

As attacks on Tesla properties continue, some Tesla owners are choosing to remove company branding from their vehicles to avoid becoming targets. This growing concern reflects the broader consequences of politically driven vandalism and the need for stronger legal consequences for those involved. (kcrg.com)

Conclusion: Political Warfare in the Streets

The pattern of paid protests and targeted vandalism against Tesla dealerships suggests a level of coordination that goes beyond spontaneous activism. With financial trails leading back to activist groups, union interests, and progressive PACs, the situation raises serious concerns about the use of protest as a weapon against political opponents. The involvement of USAID in funding global NGOs that support leftist movements further complicates the picture, showing how government resources can be leveraged to fuel domestic disruptions. The Us Against Media investigative report further highlights the interconnected network of political influencers, media allies, and Soros-funded operatives working in tandem to drive a coordinated progressive agenda. As federal investigations continue, the public will be watching closely to see whether those responsible for orchestrating these attacks will be held accountable.

Featured Articles

DOGE on Michigan Wasteful Spending: LGBTQ, DEI, and Transgender Study Funds Could Fix the Roads Instead!

by: John Clore | 3/20/2025 at 9:11 AM LANSING, MI – After writing Shocking Waste: Federal Audit Uncovers Billions Wasted on Foreign Social Programs  And seeing countless people on social media say, “We need DOGE in Michigan,” I decided to DOGE Michigan’s wasteful spending—here’s what I uncovered. Michigan’s state government

Sponsor

Investigative Reports

Nessel’s Lawsuit Against Trump: A Smokescreen to Hide 2020 Election Cover-Up?

By John Clore | Investigative Journalist | 4/1/2025 at 5:29 PM Nessel’s Diversion? Michigan AG Sues Trump Admin Over COVID Fund Cuts While Facing Her Own Scandal As Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel launches a headline-grabbing lawsuit against the Trump administration over rescinded COVID-era health grants, people are calling it

Sponsor

Sponsor

Leave a Reply